Are you in the market for a new pair of running shoes?
Look no further than Brooks, a brand known for its high-quality and comfortable footwear. But with so many options, how do you decide which shoe is right for you?
In this blog post, we’ll compare two popular models — the Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin. So whether you’re a seasoned runner or just starting, read on to see which shoe comes out on top in our running shoe showdown!
And ladies, note that we’ve specifically tailored this article with women’s brooks in mind.
Look Into Cushioning
Regarding running shoes, cushioning is one of the most critical factors. A well-cushioned shoe can help absorb impact and reduce the risk of injury.
Both Brooks Ghost and Glycerin offer excellent cushioning but differ in their approach. The Ghost features DNA Loft foam technology, providing a soft, balanced feel underfoot. On the other hand, Glycerin uses super-soft DNA material for maximum comfort during runs.
The cushioning you need depends on your preference and running style. Glycerin’s plush cushioning might be more suitable for you if you prefer a softer ride or have sensitive joints. However, if you’re looking for a balance between comfort and responsiveness, then Ghost’s DNA Loft foam should do just fine.
Consider Weight
Regarding running shoes, weight is an essential factor that you should consider. A shoe’s weight can affect performance and overall comfort during a run.
The Brooks Ghost and Glycerin have different weights. It may make one more suitable for you than the other. The Ghost weighs around 7.79 ounces, while the Glycerin is slightly heavier at about 8.61 ounces.
The Ghost might be a better option if you’re looking for a lighter shoe. It has less material and cushion than Glycerin but still provides ample support without weighing down your feet.
On the other hand, if you prioritize cushioning overweight or plan on running longer distances where extra support is needed, then the Glycerin could be ideal for you despite its slightly heavier weight.
Support Quality
The Brooks Ghost and Glycerin offer excellent support but differ slightly in their approach. The Brooks Ghost features a segmented crash pad. It adapts to each footfall for smooth heel-to-toe transitions.
It also has a midfoot transition zone. It helps guide your stride and keep you aligned. The Ghost provides reliable stability without feeling bulky or restrictive.
On the other hand, Brooks Glycerin emphasizes plush cushioning over structured support. Its DNA LOFT technology delivers softness underfoot. It is achieved while still maintaining responsiveness for optimal energy return. The shoe’s 3D Fit Print upper also offers strategic stretch and structure where you need it most.
Factoring Durability
Brooks Ghost and Glycerin are known for their long-lasting nature, but which one fares better? Brooks Ghost is built with a durable rubber outsole. It can withstand the wear and tear of daily use. Additionally, its upper mesh material provides breathability without compromising longevity.
On the other hand, Glycerin boasts a 3D Fit Print technology that enhances durability by reducing friction between different parts of the shoe. It also has an abrasion-resistant rubber sole that adds to its lifespan.
However, it’s important to note that several factors could affect its durability regardless of how well-built a shoe may be. These include frequency of use, terrain type, body weight, and even foot strike pattern.
Fit and Comfort
Running can cause blisters, pain, or injuries without proper fitting and comfort. The Brooks Ghost and Glycerin are both designed for maximum comfort.
The Ghost features a 3D Fit Print upper that provides a secure fit while allowing the shoe to move with your foot. Meanwhile, the Glycerin has an engineered mesh upper that delivers lightweight breathability.
Both models have plush collars and tongues, providing additional cushioning around the ankle area. Plus, their soft insoles offer extra underfoot support for your arches.
When choosing between these two models based on fit and comfort alone, consider trying them on first before making a purchase decision. Everyone’s feet are different – what feels comfortable for one runner or athlete may not feel as good for another.
Flexibility and Price
Let’s compare the flexibility and price of these two amazing Brooks running shoes. The Brooks Ghost has a more flexible sole, making it easier to move your feet while running. On the other hand, Glycerin is also incredibly comfortable but may feel slightly stiffer compared to the Ghost.
Now, let’s talk about pricing. Both models are priced similarly. However, the Brooks Ghost will be an excellent option if you want something budget-friendly without compromising on features!
At last, whether you choose one or another model from the women’s Brooks collection, there is no doubt that they will provide an excellent experience during your runs!
For Everyday Use
The Brooks Ghost and Glycerin Running Shoe is an ideal battle for everyday use. Not only are both shoes lightweight, but both shoes also feature breathable, supportive uppers and offer a variety of features designed to support the feet, such as:
- foam midsoles
- anatomically-shaped aligners
- Segmented Crash Pads
Ultimately, both are great options for lightweight, supportive, comfortable, and durable shoes for everyday use.
Consider These Factors In Weighing Between Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin
Both Brooks Ghost and Glycerin are two of the best running shoes available. However, they have different features that will suit other runners.
It is essential to consider the factors mentioned when comparing Brooks Ghost vs Glycerin in this post to determine which shoe is best for you! Find the shoe that meets your needs, and go for that perfect run!
For more helpful topics besides these best running shoes for women, visit our blog.
Wayne Probert is a senior reporter at Zobuz, covering state and national politics, and he is a grantee with the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. Before joining Zobuz, he worked as a freelance journalist in Kentucky, having been published by dozens of outlets including NPR, the Center for Media.
